ErgodicLabs · Edge Matrix v1.0
Monte Carlo Robustness Report
Generated 2026-06-03  00:26 UTC
Report ID MCR-20260603-446377
Simulations 1,000
Method Bootstrap (with replacement)
Portfolio (1 strategies)XAUUSDM15Portfolio263 trades  ·  66.2% WR  ·  PF 1.79  ·  Net $13,247
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION  —  1 STRATEGIES
#STRATEGYSYMBOLTFTRADES
1ATG EA 30.0XAUUSDM15263
Robustness Score
79
/ 100
Grade B+
ROBUST
DD Correlation Score  (0 – 60 pts)
Position
7.6 / 20
Spread
13.9 / 20
Predictability
17.6 / 20
Pattern Analysis  (0 – 40 pts)
MG Indicator
40.0 / 40
Integrity
Penalty multiplier
100.0 / 100
MC EQUITY SIMULATION CHART1,000 simulations  ·  Bootstrap
Monte Carlo chart
01
Simulation Outcomes
Profitable
100.0%
1,000 / 1,000
MC Median
$18,360
final balance
Luck Factor
-0.19σ
result vs mean
Percentile Rank
49.6%
original vs sims
Coeff. Variation
36.7%
σ / mean
02
Drawdown Confidence Levels
Original DD
10.8%
historical backtest
50% Confidence
13.5%
median simulated path
95% Confidence
22.9%
stress-test reference
99% Confidence
26.1%
tail risk scenario
03
Risk of Ruin
−5%
100.0%High
−10%
88.7%High
−20%
9.5%Low
−30%
0.2%Negligible
−50%
0.0%Negligible
−75%
0.0%Negligible
04
Integrity Assessment
No integrity flags detected.
05
Results Explained
Portfolio (1 strategies)  ·  263 trades  ·  1,000 sims
RISK MULTIPLIER
0.47x
LOT SCALING FACTOR
Monte Carlo simulations indicate drawdown could reach 22.90% at the 95th percentile — approximately 2.1x the original 10.76%. A proportional adjustment to 0.47x position size would align these levels. Users should evaluate based on their own risk tolerance.
Formula: Original DD (10.76%) ÷ 95% CI DD (22.90%) = 0.47x
OVERALL ASSESSMENT
Validation Result: 79/100 (B+)
Portfolio (1 strategies) presents a generally acceptable statistical profile under the historical conditions analyzed. Across 1,000 reshuffled simulations of 263 trades, indicators fell within normal ranges. No evidence of recovery-based risk mechanisms was detected (MG: 1.01×). A drawdown gap of 2.1× was observed between the original backtest (10.8%) and the 95th percentile of simulations (22.9%), suggesting the backtest result may have been influenced by the specific trade ordering. Independent investigation and additional testing are recommended before committing capital based on these results.
DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
The backtest recorded a 10.8% maximum drawdown. Across reshuffled simulations, 95% showed drawdowns up to 22.9% — approximately 2.1x the original. This is somewhat higher than the commonly observed range for this type of analysis.
ORIGINAL DD
10.8%
Historical
50TH PCT
13.5%
Median
95TH PCT
22.9%
Stress ref
99TH PCT
26.1%
Absolute worst
RISK MULTIPLIER
The risk multiplier is 0.47x, derived from the ratio of original drawdown to the 95th percentile simulated drawdown. This metric suggests that simulated drawdowns exceeded the backtest figure. Position sizing adjustments may affect drawdown characteristics — users should evaluate this based on their own risk tolerance.
ErgodicLabs.co · Edge Matrix v1.0
Statistical analysis only — not financial advice
All statistics computed from 1,000 full simulation paths
Bootstrap (with replacement)