ErgodicLabs · Edge Matrix v1.0
Monte Carlo Robustness Report
Generated 2026-06-04  03:09 UTC
Report ID MCR-20260604-542560
Simulations 1,000
Method Bootstrap (with replacement)
Spectrum Trend Pro EAXAUUSDH4MT5 Report320 trades  ·  65.9% WR  ·  PF 1.69
Robustness Score
93
/ 100
Grade A+
HIGHLY ROBUST
DD Correlation Score  (0 – 60 pts)
Position
17.1 / 20
Spread
16.4 / 20
Predictability
19.1 / 20
Pattern Analysis  (0 – 40 pts)
MG Indicator
40.0 / 40
Integrity
Penalty multiplier
100.0 / 100
MC EQUITY SIMULATION CHART1,000 simulations  ·  Bootstrap
Monte Carlo chart
01
Simulation Outcomes
Profitable
99.7%
997 / 1,000
MC Median
$19,991
final balance
Luck Factor
-0.20σ
result vs mean
Percentile Rank
51.7%
original vs sims
Coeff. Variation
52.4%
σ / mean
02
Drawdown Confidence Levels
Original DD
22.8%
historical backtest
50% Confidence
21.6%
median simulated path
95% Confidence
34.5%
stress-test reference
99% Confidence
42.1%
tail risk scenario
03
Risk of Ruin
−5%
100.0%High
−10%
99.8%High
−20%
60.8%High
−30%
12.6%Low
−50%
0.0%Negligible
−75%
0.0%Negligible
04
Integrity Assessment
No integrity flags detected.
05
Results Explained
Spectrum Trend Pro EA  ·  320 trades  ·  1,000 sims
RISK MULTIPLIER
0.66x
LOT SCALING FACTOR
Monte Carlo simulations indicate drawdown could reach 34.52% at the 95th percentile — approximately 1.5x the original 22.76%. A proportional adjustment to 0.66x position size would align these levels. Users should evaluate based on their own risk tolerance.
Formula: Original DD (22.76%) ÷ 95% CI DD (34.52%) = 0.66x
OVERALL ASSESSMENT
Validation Result: 93/100 (A+)
Spectrum Trend Pro EA presents a strong statistical profile under the historical conditions analyzed. Across 1,000 reshuffled simulations of 320 trades, indicators fell within normal ranges. No evidence of recovery-based risk mechanisms was detected (MG: 1.15×). A drawdown gap of 1.5× was observed between the original backtest (22.8%) and the 95th percentile of simulations (34.5%), suggesting the backtest result may have been influenced by the specific trade ordering. Independent investigation and additional testing are recommended before committing capital based on these results.
DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
The backtest recorded a 22.8% maximum drawdown. Across reshuffled simulations, 95% showed drawdowns up to 34.5% — approximately 1.5x the original. This is somewhat higher than the commonly observed range for this type of analysis.
ORIGINAL DD
22.8%
Historical
50TH PCT
21.6%
Median
95TH PCT
34.5%
Stress ref
99TH PCT
42.1%
Absolute worst
RISK MULTIPLIER
The risk multiplier is 0.66x, derived from the ratio of original drawdown to the 95th percentile simulated drawdown. This metric suggests that simulated drawdowns exceeded the backtest figure. Position sizing adjustments may affect drawdown characteristics — users should evaluate this based on their own risk tolerance.
ErgodicLabs.co · Edge Matrix v1.0
Statistical analysis only — not financial advice
All statistics computed from 1,000 full simulation paths
Bootstrap (with replacement)